Moz

Moz Pro / Moz API

Curated major addition platform in seo intelligence with material relevance to the Marcom operating stack and a first-party developer surface.

Analytics, SEO & experimentationSystem of intelligenceExtensible SaaS
System roleSystem of intelligence
Access maturityExtensible SaaS
Agent postureNo first-party provider verified
Reference updatedSep 9, 2025
BYO-UI reviewedJul 10, 2026

Concrete capability record

Data, retrieval, actions, identity, and operating limits

A field-by-field summary of what the reviewed first-party references actually support. Publisher update dates and BYO-UI review dates are shown separately below.

01 · Records and state owned

URL and domain link metrics, linking roots, inbound links, anchor text, top pages, and related Moz index data.

02 · Data you can retrieve

Query supported link-index metrics and link relationships for URLs, domains, and subdomains.

03 · Actions and write paths

The core Links API is analysis-oriented; no broad campaign-management write surface is represented in this profile.

04 · Authentication and permissions

Moz API credentials and subscription quotas apply.

05 · Monitoring, approval, and recovery

Expose metric definitions, index freshness, queried scope, and quota/cost context with every derived recommendation.

06 · Gaps and implementation limits

No first-party provider MCP was verified. Link metrics reflect Moz’s index and are not equivalent to search-engine ground truth.

Agent access

MCP and adjacent posture

No first-party provider MCP verified in this snapshotNo first-party provider MCP foundNo first-party provider verified

Role: none_verified

Read scope: No first-party MCP read surface verified.

Write scope: No first-party MCP write surface verified.

Authentication: Not applicable to a first-party MCP provider.

Approval boundary: Any customer-built adapter must define its own approval and confirmation controls.

Protocol does not erase product boundaries.

Confirm the current tool catalog, plan, region, scopes, rate limits, terms, and write behavior before implementation.

Editorial assessment

Access-maturity dimensions

A comparative architecture lens—not a quality score, market ranking, or buying recommendation. Scale: 1–5.

Data access4
Action access4
Event access1
Identity4
Governance4
Agent access1
UI extensibility4
Portability3
Observability3
Documentation2

Proposed interfaces

What customers could build on top.

These are design proposals derived from documented access—not claims that Moz ships these experiences.

Single-platform patterns

  • Domain authority and link-opportunity workbench
  • Executive insight brief
  • Experiment review board
  • Anomaly investigation room
Use in the brief composer →

Multi-platform compositions

  • Moz Pro / Moz API + warehouse or semantic layer: executive insight brief
  • Moz Pro / Moz API + CRM or lifecycle platform + work-management system: cross-system decision workspace
Explore composition recipes →

Evidence and dates

First-party references, with publisher and review dates separated

“Publisher updated” is shown only when the page exposes an update date. “BYO-UI reviewed” records when this research checked the reference. A missing publisher date is reported as missing—not replaced with the review date.

2 recorded sources
APIRepresentative source
https://moz.com/help/links-api ↗

First-party API reference or API overview recorded for this platform.

Publisher updated
Sep 9, 2025
BYO-UI reviewed
Jul 10, 2026

Recorded first-party developer source; summary not endpoint-exhaustive

HomepageSource inventory
https://moz.com/ ↗

First-party product homepage used to confirm product identity and current positioning.

Publisher updated
Jul 10, 2026
BYO-UI reviewed
Jul 10, 2026

Inventory source: structurally normalized; content was not individually reopened in this pass.

Verified fact

Tied to the representative first-party source or targeted access review.

Source inventory

Official links recorded for deeper research but not necessarily reopened endpoint by endpoint.

Editorial assessment

System role, maturity interpretation, and architectural boundary.

Proposed design

Interface patterns and compositions—not vendor product claims.